Rachmaninoff Prelude op. 23 no. 5, Vladimir Ashkenazy

Posted on June 20, 2012 by AmateurPianists 48 Comments

Vladimir Ashkenazy plays the famous Prelude op. 23 no. 5 in G minor. That’s probably the best version of this piece i have ever heard! Enjoy everyone!
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Vladimir Ashkenazy plays Beethoven Moon­light Sonata (sonata 14 in C sharp minor, op. 27 no. 2) part 1: mov. 1– Adagio Sostenuto mov. 2– Alle­gretto & trio

48 comments

  • busylifemeto says:

    I love gilels but he has his foot glued to the sustain pedal,it is still an amazing rendition but I think Ashkanazy has more than nailed this piece correctly.

  • BobDoleNSatanRmyniGz says:

    He seems to know exactly what he wants out of that piano.

  • BobDoleNSatanRmyniGz says:

    He seems to know exactly what he wants out of that piano.

  • BobDoleNSatanRmyniGz says:

    He seems to know exactly what he wants out of that piano.

  • erken says:

    As always, Ashkenazy show­cases Rach­maninoff perfectly.

  • IRIQUOIS227 says:

    AS clean a rendition a one will likely ever hear.

  • vckXD says:

    <33333333 [:

  • cattleman6420012000 says:

     I am an enormous fan of Ashkenazy.

  • artsloving says:

    Very emotional, beau­tiful inter­pre­tation. Possibly too roman­ticistic, I still prefer the version of Emil Gilels

  • 2012Ronpaul2012 says:

    wow. Gilel’s inter­pre­tation is amazing, but this even more powerful!

  • piano0011 says:

    Great piece! I really enjoy playing this piece and have uploaded my inter­pre­tation of this work! Although the tempo could be quicker but please feel free to comment and subscribe if you like it.

  • dgaranin says:

    Ah, I under­stand, you are going to play chamber music!

  • dkanrjskgkwlanj says:

    Because I live in London and I need to rehearse in London, and it costs and difficult to find places with piano in Korea, I am trying to reduce time of travelling.

    But your nation­ality does not matter, anybody who lives in London can come,

    so if you are a pianist, give me an email and I shall explain the details.

    Sorry you had to see an ad in You tube. I was quite desperate to find a pianist.

    All the best

  • dgaranin says:

    Why do you need a pianist from London? Does it really matter to go to Korea?

  • A8opi says:

    he is great pianist, he can plays beethoven very well too. I love him !

  • danielbriamonte says:

    La versión de Lisitsa está buena, pero su inter­pretación se parece a Chopin; y este preludio tiene que tener un ritmo firme y preciso, como el de una marcha.; y el único que lo ejecuta de esa forma es, obvi­a­mente, Vladimir Ashkenazy! ;)

  • danielbriamonte says:

    La versión de Lisitsa está buena, pero su inter­pretación se parece a Chopin; y este preludio tiene que tener un ritmo firme y preciso, como el de una marcha.; y el único que lo ejecuta de esa forma es, obvi­a­mente, Vladimir Ashkenazy! ;)

  • danielbriamonte says:

    La versión de Lisitsa está buena, pero su inter­pretación se parece a Chopin; y este preludio tiene que tener un ritmo firme y preciso, como el de una marcha.; y el único que lo ejecuta de esa forma es, obvi­a­mente, Vladimir Ashkenazy! ;)

  • danielbriamonte says:

    La versión de Lisitsa está buena, pero su inter­pretación se parece a Chopin; y este preludio tiene que tener un ritmo firme y preciso, como el de una marcha.; y el único que lo ejecuta de esa forma es, obvi­a­mente, Vladimir Ashkenazy! ;)

  • satyu131089 says:

    i love anything that ashkenazy plays :)

  • tegrenath says:

    I’ve always been a fan of the Gilels, but I might prefer the expression in this one. It’s pointless to compare the actual playing, they’re both masters of rhythm and dynamics. Lisitsa’s version shows absolutely phenomenal playing, but if I were to close my eyes and just listen there is some­thing I find missing from her interpretation.

  • howtoplayPianoMusic says:

    I like both Richter’s Gilel’s Versions better than Ashkenazy’s

  • chowderandspoon says:

    I like this version, but I like Lisitsa’s version as well :D
    love Ashkenazy.

  • willemkloos says:

    such a good tempo, would it be any slower the music would no longer exist, but right at this border, on this tap it has his full potential!

  • Posterboy777 says:

    sounds pretty sad to me“
    You’d be right, as “Quasi una fantasia” doesn’t neces­sarily mean it’s talking about unre­quited love. A “fantasy” usually refers to a compo­sition with a free-forming feel to it (almost improvisational).

  • darlss says:

    never knew this is what alicia keys covered!

  • nunoalvesfilipe says:

    a lot of a lot!! lol :o )

  • SongsofInnocence says:

    I’m no profes­sional music critic but I like Ashknazy’s playing a lot

  • blonde7000 says:

    very well said. That quote is fantastic as is the song. I used to hear this when my dad played it as a child and i love this tune just as much as i did then. It still sounds new to me and has the same affect. Fantastic piece of music.

  • GrumpyMama54 says:

    After listening to several versions and artists doing this song, I think Sofronitsky has it, in my mind. I’ve felt the agony of unre­quited love, and it’s very soul shat­tering and lonely, and this song stresses that feeling. Beethoven was a tortured soul, and the pianist that can bring that to the instrument is the messenger that Beethoven needed to carry his feelings outwards.

  • dbikeguy says:

    watch?v=9jENOitU7Ao

    mvt. 3 for all those asking.

  • paullubliner says:

    @EliasJordan3: YES WHERE!!! We want to know! I keep switching over to Brendel (also excellent) to complete this aural delight without angst.

  • EliasJordan3 says:

    Where is mvt 3 by Ashkenazy?

  • sfkeating says:

    Indeed, it is music. While you do not see it, neither do you hear it; you feel it, deep in your soul. If we are able to take anything from this world when our days are done, it is the ecstasy that these sounds, tortured or triumphant, longing or fulfilled, bring to our lives.
    Drink in all of it you are able; it is our greatest gift in life. It tran­scends time itself.

  • EliasJordan3 says:

    It’s music. You don’t see it you hear it.

  • NoirHammer says:

    LOL! Hysterical much? It’s one of the best I’ve heard so far. If I’m such a fool, why don’t you list the performers who do a better inter­pre­tation of Moon­light so I can judge “you.” You talk crap but you don’t put up. So shut up!

  • Alexjr1543 says:

    I’m sorry. Could you please be a little bit more coherent, and fix your caps lock key?

  • wholikebeethoven says:

    @NoirHammer
    I SO ANGRY WHEN HEAR U SAY LIKE THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    AT 0:35 U CAN HEARDOUBLE NOTE” ‚IS IT GOOD? IS IT REALLY LIKE BEETHOVEN?
    VERY EASILY FOUND ALOT OF MISTAKE IN THIS PERFORM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I’M SURE THAT BEETHOVENLL GIVE U A PUNCH!
    BEST VERSION OF THIS PIECE ?
    NOPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    EVEN,U SAY BEETHOVEN PLAYING LIKE THIS????
    NO,NO U SO FOOL

  • my2cents2u says:

    I love this slower version, it makes me cry. This is one of my top five all time favorite clas­sical compositions.

  • Deevers23 says:

    Ludwig Rellstab. “The name “Moon­light” Sonata derives from an 1832 description of the first movement by music critic Ludwig Rellstab, who compared it to real moon­light shining upon Lake Lucerne.”

  • sfkeating says:

    In some future age, devoid of human presence, beings from some distant star visit this planet and stumble upon this piece.
    They imagine what a shame it is that we are gone.

  • 97aaroniscool97 says:

    Dude who named it the moon­light sonata? Totally ruined the point of the piece.

  • MrKnnknn says:

    I don’t like this inter­pre­tation, not enough vari­ation in ‘key pressure’, I under­stand torture and grief, however there should still be variations.

  • lostpebble says:

    I agreed. The way he played the bass notes are amazing. It’s so somber, dark and heavy. I think that set him apart from other perfor­mances. Other good perfor­mances sounded sad, but this one gave a sense of deep sorrow.

  • NoirHammer says:

    I didn’t know he succumbed to arthritis of the hands. Nature can be cruel at times. That must be devas­tating when you think about his passion for his craft and the endless hours he spent prac­ticing. I hope he finds an effective medical solution that will allow him to interpret more works of the great masters.

  • ccdg1066 says:

    It is one of the best versions I’ve ever heard, and the first version that totally sold me on
    Vladimir Askenazy as a genius in inter­pre­tation. I was fortunate enough to have heard him at 2 concerts in Montreal before he succumbed to arthritis in his hands. I also like one of Emil Gilels’ versions, probably equally well.

  • TheMrXolotl98 says:

    ¿qué me díces de la inter­pretación de Deszö Ránki? creo que logra expresar perfec­ta­mente los mismos sentimientos pero con una sonoridad más envol­vente e intro­spectiva. Personal­mente me gusta mucho el estilo de Ashkenazy, tengo un CD con las últimas 5 sonatas para piano de Beethoven, y pienso que su ejecución e inter­pretación de la última, la no. 32 Op. 111 es de las mejores que se puedan encontrar, al igual que la “Hammerklavier”, pienso que vale la pena escuchar la de D Ránki. =D

  • baesuk81 says:

    i love vladimir along with rubin­stein. but i find this little too slow. maybe little too over­dra­matic? maybe this is the real speed. but score sheets tell me different speed. so i am lost. but this is my favorite beethoven piece. dont get me wrong. we must listent to gould version as well. u cant tell me his version carry no emotion. he is good enough to carry all emotion inside. trust me. anyway. we must like all versions. not one. ok?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>