Bernstein Conducts Mendelssohn Symphony No. 4, “Italian” (1/4)

Posted on May 19, 2012 by AmateurPianists 23 Comments

Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy: Symphony No. 4 in A Minor, Opus 90. “Italian” (1/4) I. Allegro Vivace Conducted by: Leonard Bern­stein Orchestra: New York Phil­har­monic (1953 New York Recording)

23 comments

  • subway5dollarftlong says:

    I love this piece.

  • CrotalusAtrox501 says:

    When I listened this the first time (life in a wonderful theatre, with wonderful people with me) I fell in love with the Italian Symphony…Not 5 stars, but 50. Great version.

  • 44478129102734 says:

    Thank you for uploading all 4 movements. 

  • Callistogirl1 says:

    This is from a Barbie movie. Barbie in the 12 Dancing Princesses. It is a very cool movie and this music fits it perfectly.

  • 2008Gabyzinha2008 says:

    Great recording , in terms of sound, for 1953!

  • katoppie says:

    I would NOT want to be a wind player in this recording. Those parts are hard without it racing by.
    Deadly energy though. There is a reason why Bern­stein is the man :)

  • gezunder says:

    I had that Toscanini version years ago. Really excellent, sadly now lost.

  • al1936ful says:

    @JTmusicguy  There’s a taran­tella near the end of “The Nutcracker”, and in the Barysh­nikov version it’s played slower than usual.

  • tetrisclock says:

    Karajan always conducts the best renditions.

  • MikeDrewYT says:

    There should be a contrast between this movt and the Saltarello. This movement should be distinct in every piece of every triplet, while the Saltarello should simply move in beat-units with the triplet subdi­vi­sions being nearly orna­mental. It nearly moves in 1 (with four triplets per beat, or at least two if taken in two), while this movement is clearly in four.

  • Lukecash12 says:

    Personally, I prefer the large scale classic period symphonies done HIP. But I think this orchestra possessed more balance in this perfor­mance than a lot of other attempts done without period instru­ments and techniques.

  • j72050 says:

    .…I prefer the Toscanini version, but about 1963 I heard this Bern­stein version, and had to buy it immediately.….I was a youngster then.…

  • youlittlewanker says:

    Excellent twine for soup :-)

  • jeffamarie says:

    I WISH you could bottle up what’s in the first few bars of this piece… and let it loose forever.

  • louiseduvee says:

    Best on You Tube! I’ve listened to 4 other recordings before I found this! Bril­liant! Thanks ~
    L:D

  • harpsichordRB says:

    Great Mendelssohn, Great Bern­stein!!!
    FANTASTIC!
    Thank you for posting.

  • TheStinkyTofu says:

    This piece is so catchy. It is also in my opinion one of the greatest pieces ever written. I LOVE IT

  • quelitasbuenas says:

    I believe the correct recording year is 1958

  • carke66 says:

    I have listened to 23 *yes 23 i have no life * youtubes of this and this is this the BEST

  • SAKKISAXX says:

    at 9:25 there is a strange noise, as if some­things falling down … well it REALLY does no harm to this wonderpul piece of music … but anyways, that’s YOUTUBE ;-)

  • evifnoskcaj says:

    It only makes sense to take this piece at a faster paced speed. Mendelssohn was incredibly excited when he wrote this piece after arriving in Italy. To give further example, here’s a direct quote: The Italian symphony is making great progress. It will be the jolliest piece I have ever done, espe­cially the last movement. I have not found anything for the slow movement yet, and I think that I will save that for Naples.

  • etucker82 says:

    He was slow towards the end of his career, but this is towards the beginning. For most of his career, the rule for Bern­stein was that he took fast music faster and slow music slower.

  • Sinfoniette says:

    There are more famous, and I think better rendi­tions of this Italian though. I think Karajan, Klem­perer, and my favorite, Toscanini, is great. Have you heard them or others?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>